There was a recent article in the Daily Tribune newspaper that discussed the case that the Bartow County school system brought against the State of Georgia. I have had people ask me throughout this process why we would use public money to defend one persons right to run for school board. I have been quiet on this topic for a while but felt compelled to address this issue one more time.
Now that the background stuff is out of the way here are a few thoughts & bullets that were left out of the recent story:
- We got the name wrong…The board should have insisted that it carry a group name not Lamar Grizzle’s (Bartow County School Board vs. Etc…)
- This was not about Lamar…It was about people’s right to serve and local control.
- The Georgia School Boards Association (GSBA) should have taken the lead on this action but left their membership out to dry.
- Dozens of school board members around the State of Georgia were allowed to run for office as a result of this injunction. (way bigger than one person & the real victory in this effort)
- The Legislature started this over a personal issue in a south Georgia county. (Only to adopt rules to exempt this system later)
- No other locally elected offices have to deal with this intrusion.
- Under SB84 school systems under 2800 students can be exempted from this law (political payoff?….Wouldn’t these be the most likely Nepotism candidates?)
- Although I am Republican…..The General Assembly is just wrong on education in Georgia. (Vouchers are not THE answer)
- School Board elections should be Non-Partisan statewide.
- These kind of issues are pushing me away from the GOP & more towards an independent Conservative political affiliation.
The State of Georgia and the Georgia School Boards Association forced the hand of our school board to get involved with this issue. It is inappropriate for the Legislature to try and impose its will so completely that local control has no more meaning. Republicans cannot carry the banner of “local control” only to ignore it for personal grudges and political expediency. There is always a cost to intervention but I supported then and support now the action that we took against this assault on the right of local communities to determine representation.
